| |
The following report was
written by Mr. Burgin formerly a teacher of South Craven School. It is
believed to have been written in the 1970's.
A chronological survey of important dates -
Population increases through history - Industry that established the
village.
The Danes invaded the area in 560 AD, and a
family named COLL settled the area. This family, which would be
predominantly male, adopted a feudal regime based on military might with the
fees and duties payable to the dominant chief. Two areas were appropriated
by the family COLL-LINGE or COLL-INGE meaning home, and COLL-INGE by the
River Worth. The two settlements being respectively COWLING and
CULLINGWORTH. Very little evidence has remained of how Cowling developed in
the intervening period between the arrival of the Danes, and the Norman
influence after the conquest. This in itself is indicative of the relative
lack of importance of the area at this time, probably due to the remote
position, a considerable distance from any settlement of importance at the
time.
When the Norman regime influenced the area, a period much later than the
invasion, as interest was centered very much in the South in the immediate
years following the conquest, a large area of land was given to the brothers
EMMOTT in return or as reward for military support to William l.
One brother was given the land from Laneshawbridge to Haworth, and the
younger brother, the land extending from Black Lane Ends to Cowling Hill.
This total ownership gave the Emmotts the rights to the duties and fees of
these two areas, e.g. HERIOTS where on the death of the eldest male, payment
of the 'second best' beast was payable, on such a death the strips of land
reverted back to the Lord and a son had to repurchase. The younger Emmott
was the Lord of the Manor, which included the area of Cowling.
In 1385 this Manor had eighteen couples and had expanded by 1534 to thirty
five couples. These two figures of the population of the 'manor' must be
placed firmly in perspective. These figures include only parents and give no
indication of the number of children these parents produced.
Secondly, these figures are thought to be an inventory of the men in the
manor who were eligible for military service for the Emmotts if required,
and therefore do not include the Emmott family themselves or their servants,
as these persons fulfilled a mandatory military role. A third factor
involved is that those couples indicated in the count were freemen, and any
serfs or villains owned by the Lord were not included.
The first glance appraisal of the figures is therefore misleading, it being
quite possible that the actual population of the Manor was appreciably
larger. The evidence to support this is readily available when one considers
that Skipton itself had only twenty two couples recorded in 1385.
Williams suggests that it is in this period that the area increased its
importance status and affluence. The first factor which helps support this
point of view is that a bridge was constructed at Kildwick at a cost of
twenty one pounds, £21 being quite a considerable sum at that time. Also the
Manor which included Cowling leased Glusburn for an annual rent to a
Landlord, which raised the affluence of the Lord. Payments being made part
cash, part produce, the produce being selected by the bailiff appointed by
the Lord.
The Manor passed to the Earls of Cumberland who held the
land for over a century, but in the sixteenth century three hamlets,
Cowling, Ickornshaw and Stotthill which met at Ridge Mill Bridge were sold
separately. Ridge Mill had been the corn mill for two centuries and the site
of the mill for nearly five hundred years.
This mill was destroyed by fire in 1622 but was not replaced as it had been
the centre of the manor occupying a convenient site, but with the
redistributed village, emphasis was no longer in a convenient position. It
seems likely that the new corn mill was built on the site of Lumb Mill, as
this was a more convenient site with ease of access.
The three settlements of Ickornshaw, Cowling, Stotthill,
developed at a slow sedate pace into the eighteenth century to evolve their
own identity. Beyond this, one may not comment as there is a singular lack
of document evidence to show otherwise.
Minerals were worked in this manor area during the seventeenth century.
Williams pinpoints the areas as being, the North West of the Manor where tin
and coal were the minerals concerned, and the South East where lead was
mined. He suggests that this area is the area now contained in Sutton,
indicating that the manor's boundaries exceeded the Parish boundaries as
they exist today. The 'bell pits' were worked by families on sequestration
from the freemen owners.
The event of the eighteenth century most worthy of note was the emergence of
the Non Conformist Chapel in 1724, this being the first institution of this
kind in the entire Craven area. A dam was also constructed at Surgill to
trap the beck waters into a pool, and the pool was used at the recognised
Holy Days for the baptism of converts.
It was during the late eighteenth century that the first
forms of centralised places of work began to appear. Ickornshaw Mill was
built, and this was the first mill in the area to be run by machinery.
Initially this mill was built for the making of wicks, and by the very
nature the enterprise must have been relatively small scale. A dam was
constructed to drive the machines and in 1783 the dam burst, flooding the
settlement. The pattern of factory systems
developed with the employment of loom weavers in the textile
industry. The notorious Ghyill Mill functioned almost entirely with child
labour, in the most terrible conditions.
The Mills took advantage of the skills developed during the
period when such work was conducted by individuals in their own homes, to
supplement their wage from agricultural labour. This tradition of cottage
work continued well into the nineteenth century as these early mills were
small scale and by no means established and secure. An example of this is
Lumb Mill which originally functioned as a corn mill, became a weaving mill
in 1787, and in
1849 was sold as a saw mill, with a drying kiln and joiners shop attached.
It would be fallacious to deduce that this period, the late eighteenth
century, was the time in which large scale industry with large scale
employment became established in Cowling.
What we can say is that this was the period of transition from the purely
agriculture based nature of the area, with individuals supplementing their
incomes by producing fibre and cloth, to a mottled pattern of fully and part
time employment in mills, with employment in agriculture and service crafts
still supreme.
Cowling in the
Nineteenth Century
The Introduction of Large Scale Industry - Consequent changes in
Population - New Communication Systems.
At the commencement of the century the predominant number of textile workers
were working on an individual basis in their own homes to supplement their
income from agricultural work. This work was with wool, but the impetus for
organised industrialisation came with the cotton 'boom'. In 1808 existing
mills were converted to deal with cotton textiles in response to the growing
demand for cotton garments, particularly cotton hose for the more affluent.
With this development came an influx of workers from Lancashire to provide
part of the work force, the remainder being supplied by those former
'cottage' wool weavers who were persuaded by the element of security to
become full time employees working for a weekly wage. Cotton was therefore
the motivating force behind the establishment of large scale production in
Cowling, and the emergence of Ickornshaw as a settlement based on a small
industry basis.
The period of the 1840s saw the development of a slump in cotton goods due
to the shortage of raw materials with the blockade of the United States.
This was due to an increased tariff imposed by the Northern States on the
cotton produced by the Southern States, the tariffs also increased the price
of raw cotton. It was at this time that skilled workers were lured away from
Cowling by mill owners in Sutton and Saltaire especially, offering higher
wages and improved living conditions because they were short of skilled
workers to man their new mills. These new mills were concerned with wool
products for which there was a plentiful supply of raw materials.
This depression in the cotton industry in the 1840s, reaching a peak in
1848, encouraged the existing mills in Cowling to concern themselves with
woollen products. This change paid handsome rewards when, in 1852, orders
were received for uniform and clothing material to be supplied to the
Government to equip British Troops. These orders increased in the immediate
period due to the impetus of the Crimean War.
A new mill was built in 1852 by John Binns who had for many years conducted
a successful haulage business. The major part of this business was the
carting of the wool pieces produced by individual workers in their own
cottages to the Piece Hall in Halifax where these Cowling produced pieces
were sold. The rising prices paid for wool cloth, and the lucrative
government contracts available were the impetus necessary to persuade Binns
to invest in this new venture of mill ownership. He also had first hand
knowledge of prices paid to his customers through his haulage business, and
so was fully aware of the profit margin available to a large scale producer.
The erection of the mill and the securing of finance for the project was
only the first step, the major problem was to find a supply of skilled fully
trained workers. One part of the problem was solved by the German immigrants
who had come to this country to escape religious persecution and political
upheaval created by the unification process in their own country.
These refugees were skilled educated workers who were employed to erect and
install the machinery in the mills. These were also the people used to train
the native workers the basic skills involved in operating the machinery
installed.
This would not have been satisfactory if this had been the only alternative
available, but fortunately for Binns he had an untapped reserve source of
skilled and competent workers, namely his former customers. He actively
canvassed the individual households, who previously had worked wool in their
own homes to supplement their income from day work labour, to persuade them
to come and work for a consistent weekly wage. This regular means of payment
was the key factor involved, as previously their pattern of income had been
one of 'peaks' and 'valleys' depending on whether a piece of material had
been sold in Halifax. If a piece had been sold, the family experienced
affluence for a short period, which changed to one of poverty prior to the
sale of the next piece produced. A further factor that influenced these
cottage workers to move to full time mill employment was the change in
Parish Rates made in 1847, which created unemployment amongst agricultural
workers, and subsequent reliance upon
Parish Relief for income and food. Thus regular payment for work and the
threat of being on 'the Parish', persuaded cottage workers to join the mill
work force.
Any shortage of labour that still remained was obtained from the Lancashire
cotton industry which in the 1850s, and especially the 1860s, was in serious
decline. This slump was brought about by the troubles prior to, and during
the Civil War in the United States, which at best reduced and eventually cut
off Lancashire's supply of raw cotton. The woollen industry continued to
flourish despite the fact that during 1884 trade agreements were made with
Russia and Canada to control wool exports. The outlet for exports was
restricted but prices remained stable, and a growing home market developed
for specialised wool products.
These many changes in the fortunes of' the textile industry in Cowling had a
great effect upon one particular aspect, namely the population. In 1801
Cowling had a total population of 1140 persons, as indicated by the Census
of that year, however, one must allow for inaccuracy as this was the first
full Census taken an a nationwide basis in a structured and regulated
manner. A more accurate figure to take as our base is the Census figure of
1811 which,
as can be seen from the following table, not only gives a total figure of
1449, but also divided the population into sex groups, so indicating a
higher degree of accuracy.
POPULATI0N OF COWLING IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY:
DATE MALE FEMALE TOTAL CHILDREN TOTAL POPULATION
1801 No Male or Female figures 1,140
1811 506 678 1,184 265 1,449
1821 783 898 1,681 189 1,870
1841 997 1,187 2,184 274 2,458
1851 935 1,125 2,060 243 2,303
1881 709 889 1,598 403 2,001
1901 689 863 1,552 383 1,935
Even if one discounts the 1801
figure as being inaccurate, perhaps estimating a low figure, the increases
in the population during each successive decade up to 1851 are spectacular.
In each decade, the population rose by a
minimum of twenty per cent, with the most dramatic rise being experienced in
the period 1811-1821 of some thirty two per cent. These increases in
population were so large in respect of the initial population size that the
only plausible explanation is that of immigration. The evidence to
substantiate the hypothesis is presented by the parish records which
indicate the village or town of origin of the Cowling population in 1838,
The following list indicates the number of adults who were resident in
Cowling in 1838 but who originated from many other areas.
Carleton 5 Salterforth 9
Colne 81 Nelson 34
Chatburn 4 Lothersdale 18
Cullingworth 1 Skipton 21
Barnoldswick 17 Laycock 1
Elslack 7 Farnhill 6
Oxenhope 4 Haworth 16
Otley 7 Luddenfoot 11
Foulridge 11 Steeton 19
Burnley 11 Hebden 4
Keighley 16
As these figures are for the
year 1838, one cannot accurately deduce when these 'immigrants' moved into
Cowling. However, it seems reasonable to assume that there is a strong
correlation between the immigration and the
development of 'factory systems' in Cowling. It is thought that the first
wave of immigrants were the cotton workers from Lancashire towns, in
response to the foundation of cotton processing in Cowling in 1808.+ It is
fortunate that the Census figures of 1801 are subject to doubt, as these
when compared to the 1811 figures would give a direct indication of the
number of immigrants involved in
the move from Lancashire.
As can be seen from the table of figures, the population
continued to rise to a peak in the 1840s, and it seems reasonable to assume
that such increases could not be the result of natural increase alone.
Undoubtedly some of the increase can be attributed to natural increase, as
those people who moved into Cowling were more likely to be younger married
couples, or single persons, who ultimately had families. The depression in
the mid forties did have some effect as skilled workers were lured away to
work at
Bairstows in Sutton and for Titus Salt in Saltaire. The effect of this
cotton slump was counterbalanced to a certain extent by the creation of work
by the foundation of Binns Mill, and the immigration of skilled European
workers,
particularly Germans. However, the population continued to dwindle to the
end of the century, as production stabilised and machinery improved,
lessening the need for such an extensive work force. The prime factor in
discussion of
population changes in this period is, of course, the number of children per
family, particularly when the average number of children per family was over
eight. The fall in population from 1851 to 1901 could be explained by the
movement of only twenty families from Cowling, if each of the families had
eight children. Therefore
a loss of only twenty workers greatly exaggerates the situation when first
impressions are taken of the total population figures.
A most revealing source of
information is the table of figures compiled in 1848 indicating the size of
the work force in Cowling. These figures indicate that there were a large
number of children who were either not of school
age or were non school attenders, due to being workers.
MALE FEMALE
Full time employment 724 401
Children at School 49 76
Children not at School 201 319
Non employed women 489
Paupers 14 11
Also there are approximately
111 persons not accounted for
when one compares the total figures of the Commissioners to the Census
figure of 1851. It seems reasonable to assume that these, or the majority of
these 111 persons, would be adult males who were casual workers, or small
scale farmers, some of whom supplemented their family income with casual
work. There is also reasonable evidence that many of the non school
attending children would be concerned with family work, where the motivating
force would have been family
self sufficiency.
This report also indicated the numbers of' persons employed
in the various forms of work, but gave no indication of employment by sex.
The
most immediate feature is that the one industry provided the main source of
employment, but the surprising aspect of this feature is that the percentage
of employees in the textile trade is so high.
Shopkeepers Craftsmen Services
Footware 6 Woodworkers 15 Hauliers 2
Corn 3 Builders 21 Carriers 3
Clothing 11 Metal 11 Laundress 1
Food 10 Others 1 Servants 31
Others 4
Professional
Clergy 2 Clothworkers 811
Teacher 2 Agricultural workers 101
Businessmen 6 Innkeepers 3
This further reinforces the close relationship between large scale industry
and Cowling`s development to the degree of almost total dependence.
A further revelation is the comparative low figure for
agricultural workers, as one would have thought that at this time in a
predominantly rural area, many more workers would be engaged in agriculture.
The improved methods of farming and the introduction of agricultural
machinery are the
immediate causes that spring to mind, as in many areas of the country these
were the very reasons why many agricultural workers became redundant and
were dependent
upon Parish Relief to maintain them. Undoubtedly this may well have been a
contributory factor; however, further investigation revealed that it was the
dispute between the landowning farmers and the Church Clergy that possibly
had the greater effect. This dispute originated over the amount of rate
payable to the Cleric at Kildwick as part of his annual salary, this rate
being payable in monies or in kind by the landowners. Over the years this
Customary payment had declined and in some cases, ceased completely. The
first step was taken by the Cleric in 1791 when one Reverend Marsden decided
to raise £105 from Kildwick Parish to compensate for payment in kind, as he
saw his rightful ' living' being eroded with the accompanying loss of
status. Cowling's rate was determined as being £17.16.2. which the Cowling
Landowners refused to pay, whilst all others agreed to their assessment. A
meeting was held at the Old White Bear, at which the Cowling party argued
that they preferred to pay in kind. This plea was ignored and outvoted, the
assessments being payable to Marsden.
This dispute continued and was finally solved in 1839 by
the drawing up of Parish Tithe maps and the fixing of rates by the
Commissioners according to the use of land and the crops raised. Prior to
this date, a significant area of land in Cowling had been used as arable
land, but at this
judication this land was no longer cultivated in this manner as there was a
high levy placed upon cereals. This undoubtedly had the effect of reducing
the agricultural work force, as from this point, most efforts were concerned
with pastural agriculture which necessitated fewer workers. Therefore the
dispute between the Clergy and the landowner farmers possibly had a greater
effect upon agricultural workers in Cowling than had improved methods and
mechanisation.
The textile and agricultural workers occupy a massive
percentage of the total work force, but two further groups are also worthy
of comment. The first of these are the building craftsmen who appear to be
over proportionately represented, when one considers the size of the total
population. This high figure was probably due to the influx of workers over
the years who, of course, all needed to be housed. A further factor could
have been the re-emphasis of the settlement orientation to the immediate
area alongside
the 'new' road, not to mention the creation of new work places and the
alteration of older premises. The second group are the servants who are
conspicuous, not
for their numerical proportions, but for their social origins. This group
were mainly immigrants from the older industrial areas with few outlets for
female labour. This importation was necessary as the Cowling inhabitants had
been absorbed into the textile industry and therefore the comparatively low
wages in service had little appeal for the locals.
In this period of
transformation, a major contribution was
made to the process of change by the construction of the 'new' road, opened
in 1812. Prior to this all previous roads had crossed the valley rather than
follow the low level route down the valley, with the major road being the
York
to Lancaster road which passed through Cowling Hill via Lumb Mill, Carr Head
and then Black Lane Ends. Cowling Hill, Middleton and Ickornshaw were the
three separately located housing developments and were important in their
own right,
possessing Churches, Inns and in the case of Middleton, a Post Office. The
'new' road with its down the valley cross Pennine route, reorientated the
entire settlement emphasis in the course of the century, to establish the
primary
village along its route. The majority of new building initiated by the
construction of the mill was immediately adjacent to the route, and the new
houses provided workers with a residence close to the source of employment.
The 'new' road was, of course, a Toll road, the new charges
being in 1856 as follows:-
Every horse drawn carriage 8 pence
Every horse drawn wagon 6 pence
Every horse 2 pence
Empty carts 2 pence
A drove of oxen 8 pence
Every drove of calves 4 pence
Carriages driven by steam or machinery 1 shilling per wheel.
These new charges wore introduced at this lower rate in order to attract
traffic using the road, as the Toll Company were in financial difficulties.
Paupers of Cowling were lured by the Poor Relief administrators to the
Company to offset the strain on the rates paid by the ratepayers, as part of
the rate was used to maintain the paupers. The Company paid each pauper
labourer tenpence per day plus an allowance of one shilling and seven pence
for the daily gang refreshments. Eventually the Company's interests were
taken over by the East Staincliffe Highways Board, and evidently road
maintenance was an expensive exercise as the ratepayers complained in 1884
to the Highways Board saying it was 'inoperative and very expensive'. Even
so, the road's contribution to Cowling's development and establishment as
the village we know today was considerable.
Thus the nineteenth century was a period of continual
social change which saw Cowling develop from a three nucleated rural
settlement to a large centralised industrialised village in a rural
landscape.
Style of Life in
Cowling during the Nineteenth Century.
Standard of Living - Recreation - Worship.
To determine how, in fact, the
people of Cowling enjoyed a particular style of life, if enjoyed is the
correct term to use, is extremely difficult due to the singular lack of
documented evidence on the subject. The only means available
to us in the circumstances, was to approach individuals who were resident in
the village during the 1880s to relate details of their childhood, with the
bonus of descriptions told to them by the parents of their childhood and
adult
experiences earlier in the century. The group realised that these
recollections may not be valid on all counts, but it was decided to take
advantage of these descriptions as even this source of information will
ultimately be 'lost'.
Mrs. Rushworth related to us the recalled memories of her childhood in
Cowling, all the while comparing these to her situation today. She recalled
that her mother made a crude porridge from 'blue' milk which her father, as
a boy, collected from farms. This was the staple diet along with bread, but
if bread was eaten it was with butter or jam, but not both. This meager diet
was not simply a remote case, as the majority of our respondents indicated
that this was the normal diet for the major part of the population at this
time in the mid-nineteenth century.
Perhaps a more accurate 'picture' can be determined from the relating of
childhood experiences in Cowling during the 1880s. Once again the principal
comparison made was the difference in standard of food. As a child the
family
ate meat regularly, particularly pork which was provided by her grandfather.
A secondary source was the brawn mother made from boiled sheep's head, all
scraps of meat being used and pressed into shape. Tongue was also eaten but
far less frequently, brawn being the major form of meat consumed. Fruit was
very
expensive and very rarely eaten, in sharp contrast to today where Mrs.
Rushworth eats a number of oranges, these being her favourite fruit. As a
child, bread and black treacle was a normal meal most frequently consumed,
and Mrs. Rushworth
complained that black treacle was becoming increasingly difficult to obtain
and she still 'loves' this form of treacle.
The diet of the 'average'
person would seem to have been extremely repetitive, and particularly
deficient in vitamins which are regarded as being essential today. Many
persons will have suffered, to varying degrees, elements of malnutrition and
the diet deficiency diseases, beri beri, scurvy and rickets.
From a medical health point of view there were two main areas of concern;
firstly, the problem of teeth which very quickly decayed when the central
form of diet was the 'blue' milk porridge. A Doctor Knowles in Keighley
commented on the appalling condition of the working poor, and the high
incidence of 'mouth and throat' disorder stemming from advanced decay and
the lack of any treatment. The second cause of problem centred on the
pregnant women who, due
to a lack of vitamin 'A' in their diet suffered from anemia, a condition
which was exacerbated during terms of pregnancy. Diet deficiency was also
responsible for the poor health of young children; the degree of ill health
is indicated by many school records which have logged the number of children
who were ill, the frequency of doctor visits to the school, and the reasons
for unscheduled school closures on the recommendation of the school doctors.
'School closed, thirty four confirmed cases of ringworm' 1891
'Sixteen children sent home by doctor, contact proved with
children with scarlet fever'.
'Doctor appalled with general health in the school'. 1882.
Normal diets of individuals
indicate the degree of poverty that existed in the village at this time, but
an even more distressing factor was the 'inconsistency' of products that
could be purchased, especially in the markets at the time. Sweets, such as
they were, were a particular hazard. An indication of the problem was the
two cases reported, one in Bradford, the other in Keighley. Of the two the
Bradford case was the more serious, here a confectioner was selling sweets
on the market and had purchased ingredients from a chemist. Fifteen people
who ate the sweets died and in the ensuing investigation it was found that
the confectioner had purchased powdered arsenic from the chemist by mistake
and this had been mixed into the sweets. Again in Keighley in 1883 a
confectioner purchased essence to make a form of cake and this made many
people seriously ill, This completes a very dismal picture, not only were
individuals severely handicapped by their normal diet, but also ran
tremendous risks when purchasing 'luxury' foods with any surplus money on
visits to the towns and their markets. The standard of living experienced by
these villages during the nineteenth century would appear to have been
appallingly low, especially in the time prior to 1850 and did not improve to
any significant degree toward the end of the century.
With this dismal picture in
mind of diet deficiency, repetitive meals using the same material as a base,
namely oats and 'blue' milk, or oats and water, was the social life of these
people any more pleasant or less repetitive?
Mrs. Rishworth said she had never been on holiday until she was well into
her forties when her husband received a wage increase. As a child she went
for day trips to a relative in Addingham, and these were looked forward to
as very special events. She also remembered going on trips to Hebden Bridge
and to the fair at Harrogate. The fair at Harrogate was her highlight memory
of childhood as it was the first time she had ever seen a coloured person
and a magician who was performing, attracting crowds with a monkey and a
parrot. The fair itself was a mixture of goods for sale on open displays on
the ground or no benches and sideshows, acrobats, the magician, strongmen,
medicines and herbal
remedies, a boxing booth, musicians bands. These one day outings were very
special and were events that were talked about for many months after.
Perhaps this is indicated by the very lucid description Mrs. Rishworth
gives, even though one must allow for exaggeration.
As a child home pastimes were
hopscotch, skipping and checks, and as she became older, leisure was centred
around knitting, drawing, listening to the piano, and the church. The church
especially played a very important part in
social life of families, and it seems the village itself. Sunday school was
a regular feature and was very well attended by the village children. At
Christmas, apart from breakfast and dinner, the time was spent mainly at the
chapel. The chapel provided the major part of the village communal life with
a variety of activities provided even on weekday evenings, though the
weekend was more relevant. These activities varied from services, bible
classes,
prayer meetings, to talks and lectures from visiting speakers. School was
attended until the age of 11 when she went to work as a half timer, going to
school in the morning and work in the afternoon and early evening.
Bertha Hutchinson related similar experiences, attending school from the age
of four, became a half timer at twelve, leaving school at thirteen. This
pattern of life left very little time for leisure, especially when one
considers that even when the major form of employment was in agriculture,
spare time was used to supplement wages by hand loom weaving in the home.
Children, themselves, had little spare time as in early days of the mill
system they were employed full time in the mills e.g, Ghyll Mill in Cowling
and it was not until the 1870s that education was compulsory. The conditions
of work experienced is best indicated by the rules laid down by a Burnley
Mill Owner in 1852.
RULES AND CONDITIONS
OF W0RK FOR OFFICE EMPLOYEES.
The new improved working hours
are from 7.a.m. to 6.p.m., work commencing with daily prayers.
Lunch may be taken from 11.30 to 12 noon but there will be no cessation of
work.
There will be no taking during working hours.
There will be no smoking or taking of alcohol.
There will be no leaving the office without the permission granted by the
Head Clerk. If it is necessary for toilet purposes you may go down the
grounds to below the second gate. The said grounds to be kept tidy.
There is a stove in the office for heating, and it is recommended that each
member of staff bring 4 lbs of fuel each day.
Each member must be somberly
dressed. No garish colours may be worn.
No overcoats may be worn in the office but neck scarves and head coverings
may be worn in very inclement weather.
Wages. Up to ll years of age ls.4d. a week
Up to 14 years of age 2s.7d. a week
14 years old 2s.ld.
Juniors 4s.8d.
Junior Clerks. 8s.10d.
Clerks. l0s.9d.
After 15 years service,
Clerks 21s. a week.
'It is hoped output will be increased in these near Utopian situations.'
As can easily be seen, the
conditions of work and the rules that regulated these conditions were harsh,
and these of course only applied to the office workers. As Bridstow states '
the mill workers were segregated by status and
pay', indicating that the office staff were given a higher status, more
privileges and enjoyed higher rates of pay than did the manual work force.
The combination of harsh
working conditions, comparative low rates of pay a deficient and repetitive
diet, and long hours of work in employment and in the home, highlight the
rather mundane existence of the villagers during the nineteenth century, and
more especially during the first half of the century.
The needs of the inhabitants
had to some extent been catered for by the establishment of the
Non-Conformist Chapel in 1724 and the erection of a dam at Surgill for the
purposes of baptisms. This further supplemented the services
provided by the established church sited at Kildwick. Cowling, as a village,
was within the Kildwick Parish and until Cowling had its own Church built in
1844, all baptisms, Burials and Church of England services were conducted at
Kildwick.
This necessity to travel established a well used track from Cowling to
Glusburn and on to Kildwick, which became known as the 'Burial Way'. Parts
of this route still exist today running from Ickornshaw down the side of the
church to meet
the Lothersdale, Cononley footpath which then follows the original route.
The religious organisations provided the only formal activities available in
the village, originally these were the only activities organised for the
community
outside the home.
The Church was not simply
concerned with the primary religious functions, but was also very much
concerned with the social welfare within the community and its
administration. The Vicar and Church Wardens of Kildwick were responsible
for the administration of a will trust left by John Rycroft in 1532. This
trust consisted of £239 of which £159 was to be used to purchase five plots
of land, the rents forthcoming from which to be payable to the poor of the
parish. The further £80 was to be used to purchase 120 cattle, these then to
be let to the poor at a rent of 8d per cow per year. All monies received
from these rents were.
distributed by the Overseers of the poor to each village within the Parish
of Kildwick, according to the proportion each collected as its contribution
to the Poor Rate. The total amount distributed each year was £14.5.11, of
which
£2.-.10. was paid to the village of Cowling. This trust was administered
until 1893, though it ceased to be poor relief in 1859 when the rate system
was introduced for each village.
Poverty was also the
motivating factor in the establishment of the Kildwick Parish Friendly
Society. Individuals were constantly aware of the problems that they would
face if their income was reduced or endangered completely by sickness or
injury. The Friendly Society was created as a means of self help or
protection if some unforeseen ill fortune were to strike. The essence to the
group was for each member to pay into the Society 2/- per quarter, and if
the member was unable to work he would receive 7/- per week.
KILDWICK PARISH FRIENDLY
SOCIETY RULES JANUARY 1st 1799.
1. Each member to pay 2/- quarterly into the box, besides the allowance for
ale.
2. Any member sick or lame or otherwise indisposed so as to render him unfit
to work shall receive 7/- weekly.
3. When any member shall depart this life there shall be paid the sum of
5gns out of the box to defray the expenses of the funeral.
4. After payment for twelve months to any member, his pay will then be only
5/- per week.
5. Any member refusing to conform to the rules shall forfeit 6d to the box.
6. Any member joining the procession in a state of intoxication or behaving
disorderly or absent from Divine Service shall forfeit 1/- to the box.
7. The Master and Stewards to lead the procession, the rest of the members
to follow two abreast, each furnished with a sprig of Green Oak.
The Society continued to function until 1844, when dwindling membership
increased the pressure on withdrawals and created debt. Though not directly
administered by the Church there were very strong links between it and the
Society throughout
its existence.
The religious bodies created a
common bond in a community and in making themselves a focal point for
community activities united the community in a way that had never been
experienced previously. However, within the system of social
welfare, the provision of community activities and the protection of
individual interests, one function of the Church remained supreme. This of
course being the promotion of their individual doctrines of religion, and it
was the necessity to achieve these goals that led to a certain amount of
dissent and division in the community. All was well until the establishment
of the Non-Conformist religions in the district from 1672 onward. Both the
Baptists and Methodists became established in Cowling in the early
eighteenth century and this had a very significant effect upon the Church of
England. From the Visitation Return of 1743, only sixteen persons attended
to celebrate Holy Communion in Kildwick Church on the Sunday before
Whitsuntide. What proportion of this congregation came from Cowling is
impossible to establish, however it would seem reasonable to assume that
Cowling's representation would be very low, if any at all were present, when
one considers the distance of travel involved. To add to the problem of
falling attendances, the Vicar of Kildwick was also under pressure to
collect the tithe payments. There was a natural reluctance to pay these
levies on the part of the villagers, and this came to a confrontation in
1791. The Rev. Marsden, who was the Vicar of Kildwick at the time was
disturbed that the payment in kind of the tithe had dwindled to such an
extent that a money tithe should be substituted. The
figure of £105 was to be raised from the Parish of which £17.16.2 was to be
Cowling's contribution. Cowling objected to this amount and refused payment.
Subsequently a meeting was held of all the villages, in the Old White Bear
Inn Cross Hills, where the representatives from Cowling submitted that they
preferred the old system of payment. The meeting found that the sum of £105
was reasonable and that each village had to pay the original stated amount.
This still did not satisfy the Cowling people and two men walked to Oxford
to register their 'petition' of protest. They went to Oxford, as part of the
Kildwick tithe was paid to one of the Oxford Colleges, and their petition
can still be seen today in the Bodlein library in Oxford University. The
principle that motivated these men to take this tremendous journey was not
the amount of money the village paid but that the village had to pay this
tithe at all. There was, undoubtedly, a significant opinion that the village
did not receive an adequate 'service' from the Church of England, no doubt
being due to the large percentage of the population being non-conformists,
as well as the disgruntled Anglicans.
It seems reasonable to assume
that Cowling was a deeply divided village in terms of denominational worship
during the nineteenth century, and also that there would be a strict
affiliation in village activities according to a
particular religious allegiance. From amongst these wranglings emerged a
particular form of welcome innovation which was a tremendous benefit to the
community, namely the Sunday Schools. It must be stated that these were
exclusively the province of the Non-Conformist organisations, who realised
that one of the Community's real needs was education. Originally the Sunday
Schools had no
religious content at all, they were provided by the Chapel to help the
illiterate in the village to read, even though the motive was perhaps to
enable everyone to read the Bible. The Chapel premises were used and the
reading was taught by those adult members who could read and write. Further
advances were made by teaching those who could read to write. These original
objectives were eventually broadened to include classes for young men and
women, the sexes being taught apart, and these advanced to bible classes.
Whittaker** stated that " the Wesleyan Methodist Chapel at Ickornshaw had a
Sunday School of 270 scholars and 57 teachers with a library of 450 volumes.
The Primitive Methodist Chapel at Middleton had a Sunday School of 26
scholars and 6 teachers. The Baptists at Cowling Hill had a Sunday School of
110 scholars and 15 teachers, The United
Methodist Free Church built in 1882 at a cost of £5000 and a new organ built
by J. Laycock at a cost of £400, has a Sunday School connected with 320
scholars and 68 teachers".
**Whittakers History of Craven
Appendix 2.
Village Development to
the Twentieth Century.
Village expansion - Village
Amenities - Development -of the Parish Council - Extending Influence of the
Council.
In the previous chapter we
discussed how the Church played a principle role in the development of
Cowling as a community and the provider of a stability and consensus. It is
the purpose of this chapter to extend this examination to determine the
physical factors that also provided the stimulus for village development.
The three factors which must
first be considered are those of industrialisation, the re-location and
siting of the village and communication systems. Perhaps the most
significant impact was made by the 'new road' built by trustees from Colne
to Addingham following a lower route from Colne over Reedshaw Moss running
through Cowling, Glusburn and Cross Hills and completed in 1809. This road
replaced the old road which had followed a line from near Colne through
Black Lane End, over the hill past Cowling Hill, Carr Head and Malsis to
Glusburn**, permission for which had been granted by an act obtained in
1755. This new road was the first major piece of construction that had
followed a rough west to east line, all previous major routes had followed a
more north to south line apart from the road through Cowling Hill. In
consequence, Cowling as a settlement was widely dispersed, there being three
centres of housing, namely Ickornshaw, Middleton and Cowling Hill. The
effect of the road was to draw both industry and housing to it and so
re-locate the focal point of the settlement to a position it principally
enjoys today.
Industry was, of course, quick
to see the advantage of the roadside position and any new development took
place along the road, most notably Croft Mill opened in 1853. The road
enabled the swift movement of raw materials and finished products even
though tolls had to be paid. In fact this Blackburn, Addingham Cocking End
Turnpike road was a supplement branch to the Keighley - Kendal turnpike
completed in 1798 and as such gave Cowling a major road access to a much
wider network of transport systems. It gave a superior line of communication
to the Wharfe of the Leeds Liverpool canal at Kildwick. This Wharfe handled
coal, lime stone, iron, corn, wool and cotton making the raw materials, so
desperately needed as the village expanded, more readily accessible. The
canal and the turnpike roads removed Cowling from its isolation and was
given the access of trade with North Yorkshire, Leeds and South Yorkshire,
Manchester and Liverpool and South Lancashire. Local manufacturers no longer
had to depend on the slow packhorse and could now use wagons or barges to
distant market outlets. Perhaps an even more significant factor in transport
was the ability to move the basic raw material, coal, to the site of
production, and this undoubtedly benefited Cowling a great deal with the
introduction of steam driven machinery later in the century. Cowling also
enjoyed cheap transport due to the ability of haulers to avoid payment of
tolls especially at the Cross Hills junction where no toll post existed, so
hauliers could pay a toll at Steeton Bar as if they were travelling to
Snaygill and then proceed up the new turnpike to Cowling. To prevent this
weakness in human nature, a toll post was erected at Cross Hills Junction in
1848 where the following tolls were in force.
For every horse drawn carriage
8d.
For every horse drawn waggon 6d.
For every horse 2d.
For empty carts 2d.
For every drove of oxen 8d.
For every drove of calves 4d.
For every carriage driven by steam
or machinery or any other power other than animal 1/- per wheel.
A further impetus was gained
with the opening of the railway in 1847, and the station at Kildwick. The
rail services developed to such an extent that by 1871 there were seventeen
trains a day calling at Kildwick, the first at 5.20a.m. the last at 9.40p.m.
Cowling was the last of the local villages to have a regular service link
between the village and the station and this was introduced by Ezra Laycock
in 1898. This was the first regular service, but previous to this it had
been possible to
pay for a lift down to and back from the station on an individual basis. The
railway, not only was a boost to industry, but provided a cheaper form of
transport for passengers with special cheap fare trips to the coast,
countryside and towns designed for the working class, though how many could
afford these trips is left open to doubt.
The development of transport
systems and industrialisation had a tremendous effect upon Cowling, it
established a new site for the village and introduced a new period of
prosperity and development. A true indication of the prosperity of Cowling
can best be gained by examining the factor of population increase. The
population rose from 1,449 in 1811 to 1,935 in 1901. The peak of population
was achieved in 1851 when the population reached 2,458. The attraction of
employment in the developing industries and the security of working for a
firm that were under contract to the government was undeniable. It was first
the expansion of cotton textiles in a period 1808 to 1820 and later the
establishment of a factory organised wool textile industry in the 1840s and
1850s that created this new source of employment.
If one considers the incidence
of marriage in this period, and the percentage of the Cowling population
that were married, this also gives us an impression of the boom effect
experienced in the village. The average national figure in 1851 for married
men of marriageable age was 52%, whilst in Cowling this was almost 80%. In
1853, 506 men over sixteen had been, or were married, whilst for the female
population, the corresponding figure was 489. These relatively high
proportions were an indication of the effect of the influx of workers to
Cowling. Even if the workers were married, their children married in the
village as second generation Cowlingers, but a more reasonable explanation
is that a number of the 'immigrant workers' would have been single men who,
due to the lack of family ties, had the ability to be mobile and seek
employment. These single immigrants subsequently married in the village and
brought their families.
The occupations listed in the
1848 Census also gives an indication of how the village had developed. (See
table in Chapter 2).
The high proportion of craft
workers for the size of the population is also an indication in itself of
the pressure and need for new buildings. The influx of workers and their
families placed great pressure on the existing housing, even though severe
overcrowding was prevalent. The scattered settlement of Cowling prevailed
for many years, but eventually housing became established along the 'new
road' side. Building development in the village was initially concerned with
industrial premises, and the housing developments took place at a much later
date. From the Tithe Map of 1839 it was easily seen that there was a total
lack of building where the bulk of the village exists today.
The increasing population not
only had the effect of housing development, but also created the need for
services in the village. No accurate records of retail outlets exist which
indicate what numbers and types of shops and business premises existed in
the pre 1840s. Some indication of the extent of shop premises can be gained
from the Craven Directory of 1884. The members of the group believed that
this record did not give a true indication of the commercial enterprise in
the village, and compiled a list of premises that existed in the early
twentieth century.
**Kings Highway in Craven John
J Brigg
1 Craven Directory Appendix 3.
These were listed as follows:
Middleton:
Barber, butcher, grocer, Co-operative, baker, ice cream and
chip shop.
Ickornshaw:
Grocer, iron works.
Winkholme:
Shuttleworth and Stirk, 2 cloggers, herbalist and spices,
oatcake sales.
Keighley Road (facing down to Cross Hills, left hand side):
Sweets general, herbalists, butcher, cycles, drapery and shoes, cloggers,
post office, grocer/butchers, corn merchant, dividend store, barber, baker,
baker/grocer, co-op, baker, clogger, milliner/tailor, hairdresser, paint
shop, baker, sweets/baker, grocer, hairdresser.
Keighley Road (facing up to Colne, commencing at Lane Ends):
Grocer, tailor, sweets, laundry, greengrocer, gents outfitter, Solicitor,
grocery, butcher, blacksmith, milliner, chip shop, pie and peas, baker,
greengrocer, grocer corn miller, druggist and barber, chip shop,
photographer, hairdresser, sweets, paint shop, Queen street bakers.
Carr Mill Lane:
3 joiners shops.
Lane Ends:
Wheelwright, Doctor, 2 Stables.
As can be seen there was a
great proliferation of the small family concern, the majority of which being
established to meet the needs of the growing population. One wonders, in the
light of fierce competition, how in fact these businesses, grocers and
bakers especially, managed to make a living for their owners. However, a
baker at the time is recorded as saying that if your trade had a focus of 'a
dozen families', then this was sufficient to provide a living.
As can be seen, the trade and business must have been there for these number
of shops to exist, and is perhaps the most accurate means available to gauge
the development that took place in the village especially in the second half
of the
century.
The dramatic increase in the
village population that had taken place since 1811 to a peak in 1861, was
followed by an equally swift decline, there being some 535 fewer persons
resident in the village in 1901 than 1861. However,
this in no way was reflected in the extent to which the size, physically, of
the village had developed and expanded during this time. By 1901 'massive'
housing development had taken place, and was still in progress, with
families living in less crowded conditions in houses with more amenities.
To match the expansion and
development of the village was the growing need for village administration
of the affairs of the village and as a result emerged the Cowling Parish
Council. Cowling had always contributed to the administration of the area,
there being nineteen Cowling resident representatives in the 1379 *Wapentake
of Staincliffe and Ewrcross. The Wapentake was a 'local court' which decided
all issues, but whose main influence was the settlement of all civil issues,
especially water rights, land tenure, debts etc. The Wapentake was an
extremely influential body and was in a way the early form of council
administration.
* Poll Tax returns of the
Wapentakes of Staincliffe and Ewcross
Richard 11 (AD 1379)
Cowling was also represented at the Battle
of flodden Field in 1513, four men being part of Lord Clifford's retainer.
These were Pers Tyllotson A
Bow, Able, Horse & C.
Xrofer Lakok A Bow
Nicolas Starburg
Henry Waller of Ceollyng (Cowling)
These men would have been
called upon because they held land from Lord Clifford in return for such
military service. These two historical references show that Cowling had
played a part in the administration and affairs of the area in the years of
development of the nation.
Cowling's administration and
the extent of governing powers over settlements during the sixteenth,
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries is extremely vague and remains a matter
of conjecture. Taxes (tithes) were payable to the Vicar of Kildwick to
provide his 'living' and these were usually paid in kind. Tenants paid rents
for their land to the landowner, again usually a mixture of payment in kind
and money. These general statements are all one can give due to the obscure
nature of the evidence available, and the total lack
of documented evidence on the subject. The only available reliable evidence
that can be quoted concerned the collection and administration of Parish
Relief.
This area was particularly fortunate to be endowed by the Rycroft Trust. On
his death John Rycroft, by a Bill of Petition in 1552, left £8 to be
administered in the Parish of Kildwick by the Vicar and two Church Wardens.
This sum was to be used to buy cattle and land and these were then to be
rented. The profit was then to be used to buy 'bread, drink and cheese', and
'they to be let to the poor people of the parish on the said day obyt'.*
Portions of land were
purchased in Cowling for £40 with a yearly rent payable of £2.7.-. by
William and John Laycock of West field in Cowling. The important feature of
this trust was the aid given to the poor who were unable to support
themselves,
there being little or no provision of this nature in the majority of rural
areas at the time.
However with agricultural
advance and innovation there was a decline on a nationwide basis for the
service of agricultural labourers. Cowling was no exception, and to help
provide for the poor a rate was levied from landowners
and tenants. To help reduce the levy in 1555 every able bodied man had to do
four days labour per year on the road, and this later rose to six days. The
fund for Poor Relief was administered by the Parish Wardens who had this
power
granted by Acts of Parliament. The records of this formal body have proved
impossible to trace, but at the passing of the Relief Act in 1835 there is a
record that the administrators paid pauper labourers at the rate of 10d. per
day plus the refreshment cost of 1/7d per day for the gang. The Township
Book records that work was on the roads, drainage and repairs. The most
significant advances
in agriculture and consequently labourer redundancy took place in the 19th
century, and. the situation was certainly not improved from Cowling's point
of view by the Tithe Commutation Act of 1838. The Tithe Commissioners were
empowered by the Tithe Act 1837, in default of agreement between the
landowners and tithe owners, to grant a compulsory award to the tithe owner.
The tithe owners in Cowling's case were Christs Church Oxford who were the
patrons of the 'living' of Kildwick. As we have noted previously there was,
and still existed, an element of disagreement concerning the levy of
Cowling's
rate decided by the Rev. Marsden. The Tithe Commissioners drew up Tithe maps
which documented the tithe district, state of cultivation of the land, land
exempt and land subject to tithes.^ Statistics were compiled to indicate the
respective numbers of bushels of wheat, barley and oats which could have,
theoretically been purchased by one third of the total rate levied at the
date price.
* Rycroft Charity Appendix 4
^ Tithe Commissioners Appendix 5.
The prices prescribed by the Act were:
7 - 0 1/4d per imperial bushel of wheat
3 -11 1/2d per imperial bushel of barley
2 - 9d per imperial bushel of oats
and a rent charge was fixed to
land against each unit of charge. The key to the determining of the rent was
the actual use to which the land was put, there being a low value placed on
rough pasture through all uses to arable land of which the cultivation of
wheat was regarded highest. The practical effect was that cultivated land
was given a higher rate than pasture. From the Commissioners Map and their
written observations, it was interesting to note
that a certain area of land in Cowling was at the time under cultivation
producing barley and oats. This land was on the north west slope as one
faces up the valley. The vast majority of the land was pasture as one would
perhaps expect. Higher rates were also charged on buildings, especially corn
mills, and all kinds dealing with the produce of agriculture.
The Tithe Acts had the
undoubted effect in many areas of restructuring the form of agriculture so
that a more favourable rate was payable. This is especially true in the case
of Cowling where all arable land rapidly disappeared so to avoid a high rate
levy or a not too profitable crop. The
effect of this was to reduce the numbers of' agricultural employees as the
effective need of manpower was reduced, and if it had not been possible to
absorb these redundant workers into the developing industry in Cowling, then
the village's history would undoubtedly have been radically different.
The Tithe was important as it
established a precedent in that there now existed a system of rate levy that
was directly based on the ownership and tenancy of land, and the occupation
and use of buildings. It was a small step therefore to utilise this system
when the local government operations first came into being.
The necessity for local
administration came basically from the pressing need for the provision of
amenities for local communities. The nineteenth century saw the upsurgance
of urban communities, and this presented many problems socially. The first
major innovation which initiated the form local administration was to take
was the founding of the Local Board in 1858. This was a body of nine elected
individuals from a total of thirty candidates who were nominated for
election. The powers of the Board and their sphere of administration seem to
have been unspecified. The
area they administrated is also unclear, but Cowling was included in this
area.
The East Staincliffe Highways Board was established in 1864 with the
imminent collapse of the Turnpike Trusts. This was a body that was directly
responsible to the Local Board, with responsibility for the repair and
revenue from the
highways. The Rural Sanitary Authority was introduced in 1872 which was
responsible for all sanitary provisions and policy making but had no
responsibility or authority over water supplies.
These three bodies were
established in response to central
government legislation but the provisions of the legislation were directly
related to urban areas in an attempt to overcome the problems experienced by
towns and cities at the time. It was therefore extremely difficult to apply
these powers to rural areas, as these had previously been administrated by a
multiplicity of bodies, and the powers given to the 'Boards' only clearly
defined authority in existing urban situations.
This state of confusion existed for many years, and this is perhaps best
illustrated by the fact that Cowling was, at one time, administrated for by
Keighley and then later by Skipton.
This inadequate position was
even further complicated by the
fact that many of the services provided in the nineteenth century were
supplied by private companies, for example, the Kildwick Gas Company. The
more isolated rural settlements suffered from the Board administration in
that there was no overall uniformity of standards and no enforcement of
central government legislation because of the lack of statutory powers to
deal with the rural situation.
Due to these rather chaotic
situations, many complaints came
from the freeholders and tenants who were paying a rate levy, in that they
could see very little being done for the rather high rates they paid. In
1884 the rate payers complained to the Highways Board that it was
practically inoperative and very expensive to maintain. Angry rate payers
are not just a phenomena of the twentieth century. The first advance was
made with the establishment of the Parish Council which, as one of its
first duties, named the streets in Cowling in 1894. In December of the
same year, elections for the Council were held, there being twenty five
nominated candidates of which nine were elected. The elected persons were
as follows:-
William Bannister Boxmaker
77 votes
Everatt Binns Manufacturer 107 votes
Albert Fletcher Draper 91 votes
Sam Gott Grocer 88 votes
Chairman John Hartley Manufacturer 131 votes
Jonas Laycock Warp Dresser 87 votes
Clerk Phillip Snowdon Retired Civil Servant 125 votes
Vice-Chairman Thomas Watson Manufacturer 128 votes
John Whittaker Farmer 72 votes
The founding of the Parish
Council was made possible by the 1891 legislation which, when its
implications were assimilated was implemented in 1893 in most areas of the
country. This period of limbo was worthwhile as it enabled a fuller
implication of the powers given to local councils to be formulated and so
their actions were now logically based.
This first council was
extremely busy with all manner of duties, both personal and public service
matters, this is abundantly clear from the minutes of the Council
Meetings. Not all the duties were pleasurable as is shown by the planning
application of Mr. Albert Fawcett to build a bay window, this being
rejected without any reason being given. The majority of time was
concerned with the provision of services or the extension and improvement
of existing services. In 1895 there were many complaints about the
inadequate Scavenging Service, and after much discussion it was decided to
arrange a more frequent service. New footbridges were also to be provided
on the footpath ways over the beck as the old bridges were in serious
disrepair. A very important amenity was the installation of street
lighting, and this was first introduced in 1896 when six street lamps were
purchased from the Kildwick Gas Company for 12/6d each, with John Drake
employed by the Council as lamplighter, being paid £12 per year for his
services. A year later the council decided to extend their lighting
system, but as this involved a sum of £260, this was put to a vote with
264 votes for and 105 against. J. Whittaker and H. Gott were appointed to
replace the Church Wardens who had administered the Parish Relief System,
and this example perhaps best indicates how, in such a short space of
time, the Council had truly become the central feature of responsibility
for village affairs.
The sphere of influence of
the Council continued to grow
and in 1897 there were sixty street lights and twenty one applications for
the post of lamplighter, Amos Stephenson being appointed. In the same year
the village was provided with a link to Cross Hills by the Lothersdale and
Cononley Light Railway. Important as this link was, it was the planning of
a sewage scheme in 1900, and its completion in 1908, that was perhaps the
greatest achievement of the early Councils.
This Western Sewage
Scheme provided quite an advanced amenity for a large proportion of the
village which was practically unprecedented for a community of this size
and in such a rural environment.
All these provisions
required finance and the vast majority of the money came from Central
Government via Keighley Council, though some finance was provided by the
private companies who put the services into operation and then charged an
annual rent. In 1919, the first rate was paid to the Skipton Rural
District Council by tenants and freeholders alike, but it is not clear at
what point prior to the Parish Council that rates, as we know them today
were instituted, or what the rate levies actually were, and how they were
determined. In 1921 the West Riding County Council assumed responsibility
for all major roads and drainage and Skipton Rural District all aspects of
public health and sewage. The first council housing was initiated in 1920
by the Rural District, and in 1922 road improvements and resurfacing of
roads in Miiddleton and Cowling Hill.
Thus from a very
disorientated beginning in the mid nineteenth century, local
administration was soundly based in the last decade of the century, and a
rapid development saw the introduction of many important services and
amenities in the village. It was this development of the Parish Council
that completed a century of dramatic change in Cowling, and firmly
established a self regulating, homogeneous community far different from
the existing system in 1800.
The Village Today
Our final chapter is an
attempt to determine the nature of life in Cowling today. This in itself,
presents many problems, the major factor involved being how to construct and
conduct an investigation of social life that would achieve valid results. It
is also difficult to determine which aspects to include and which to omit,
it being impossible in the time available to take into account every single
feature involved in this most complex problem. The group finally decided
that a survey was the most convenient means of achieving our goal, but this
presented the problem of determining a size of sample that would reflect an
acceptable reliable indication of the present position. It was decided that
the survey would be conducted purely at random, with each member of the
group taking responsibility for conducting the survey with part of the
sample.
The construction of the
questionnaire was equally difficult, it being finally decided to construct
questions to try and determine the answers to questions the group thought
most relevant. The first question to be asked was how long people had been
resident in the village in an attempt to verify the belief that there had
been a recent trend of incoming population. A sequence of questions then
continued this theme hoping to reveal how long the family had been Cowling
residents, and if so, how many generations of the family had lived in
Cowling. If the respondents had no previous family affiliation with the
village they were then asked where they had lived previously, and the
reasons why they had decided to come and live in Cowling.
A number of relevant responses were made available for this section. To find
if there was any link between residence and occupation, a section of
questions was included to determine where people worked, the nature of their
occupation and how far people had to travel to work from the village. It was
thought by the group that there was a correlation between work situation
outside the village and the participation in leisure activities within the
village. To determine the extent individuals participated in village based
activities, a series of questions were formulated to discover what
proportion of leisure time was spent in the village, what organised
activities were patronised, and what activities not listed were also
regarded as leisure pursuits.
This questionnaire was then
duplicated, and conducted in a random way by the group with due
consideration being given to the age structure of the sample, where
possible, individual members collecting a wide spread of respondents. Even
though the questionnaire appeared to be extremely simple in construction,
the 'weight' of information it provided was in fact formidable.
We were fortunate that very
few prospective interviewees refused point blank to entertain our work, and
only a minor proportion expressed any reservations. One question did seem to
raise objections in a number of respondent's minds who did not think it was
necessary to respond to the question 'What is the nature of your
occupation'. These reservations were accepted and all other questions seemed
to be acceptable, and the responses to these, in many cases, were not just
confined to a 'straight' answer. Much significant peripheral information was
collected in the form of explanations why people took leisure time outside
the village, why they had come to the village and what the village lacked in
social amenity. It was the volume of information, directly asked for or
freely given, that posed the major problem.
It took a number of weeks to collate and assimilate the information to a
'master' from which it was possible to draw conclusions.
In our RESIDENCE section quite
an interesting pattern emerged. The response to our length of residence was
as follows:
<1Yr, 1-5Yrs, 6-10Yrs, 10-15Yrs, 20-30Yrs, All your life.
10, 21, 5, 2, 7, 23
This indicates that a
significant portion of our sample were relatively recent residents in
Cowling, this proportion being almost identical to those resident in the
village for all their life. This was further supported by the generational
family representation in the village.
GENERATIONS:
TWO,THREE,FOUR,FIVE,MORE THAN FIVE
17,5,3,9,13.
This second table of figures
acts as a control as they indicate that there is a much stronger family tie
with village residence than our first table of figures would have us
believe. There is almost a traditional residence pattern with successive
generations maintaining their ties with the village.
Even so, the cumulative evidence of these figures indicate that a
significant proportion, some 28% have no family ties with the village, and
of these 16% had taken up residence in the preceding five years. The group
believe that this is a most important feature with respect to the village as
a community. This would seem to be the case especially when one considers
that the population of the village has not increased noticeably during the
last twenty years. Also when the age structure figures are taken into
account, one can accurately surmise that the effect of young married
couples, possibly with young children moving into the village, is
counteracted by the emigration of young, possibly single persons, and older
married couples.
What can be stated accurately is that the numbers of young children, young
married couples and people over 45 are increasing whilst the number of young
people between 18-23 and 35-45 is decreasing. One has only to see the
situation at the Primary School to appreciate the effect this influx of
young couples with younger children has had. Teaching space is now at a
premium, the problem being that the volume of pupils is not decreasing and
these have to all move through the school in their year groups.
Those residents who had moved
into the village were of particular interest to us, and it had been
previously decided to ask any person who was in this group where they had
formerly resided, and what reasons or factors had induced them to choose
Cowling rather than another village in the area.
The response to the origin of residence gave us a wide and varied pattern,
there being families from CROSS HILLS, GLUSBURN, LOTHERSDALE, SUTTON,
BRADFORD, BINGLEY, CHESTER, ILKLEY, LEEDS, ROCHDALE, NEWCASTLE and two
families from COLNE, CONONLEY, LONDON. The majority were young couples of
under 30 who had moved into the area, but significantly there were also four
couples who had retired from their principal occupation and now had part
time work. It was not just the numbers of new residents or their place of
origin that was particularly significant, it was their reasons for moving
into Cowling that were most revealing. We gave six categories for response
and the responses were as follows:
AVAILABILITY of HOUSING - 9
CONVENIENCE - 0
CHEAPNESS - 5
FAMILY - 0
OCCUPATION TIES - 5
PLEASANT - 0
The feature of these responses
was that those who had come from the furthest original settlements were
those who indicated multiple reasons e.g.
NEWCASTLE cheapness,
availability, rural position
LONDON cheapness, convenience, rural position
LONDON cheapness, convenience, rural position
CHESTER convenience, occupation, cheapness.
The single most significant
reason was the availability of housing, but perhaps a more important factor
for those who were purchasing their own home was the element of price. It
appeared that the new residents were very surprised that the cost of a
dwelling in this area generally was far less expensive than the areas from
which they had moved, and the choice of type of housing they were able to
afford was much wider. Some indicated that an added factor to their choice
was the pleasant rural position of the village, which was not so isolated as
to make the general pattern of their lives inconvenient.
A persuasive factor for the couple who were both in full time employment, or
the wife working part time, was the geographic location of Cowling. Four of
the couples had specifically chosen Cowling simply because it was a place of
residence equidistant from the work places of the husband and wife, each
being able to conveniently travel to work from Cowling.
There was, therefore, a rather
complex network of reasons which brought these new residents to Cowling. It
being a combination of relevant factors rather than one specific reason that
had created the initial interest, though it does seem that the availability
of housing was the final vital factor. It does seem that a village of
Cowling's size, position and location, and the price of its housing,
possesses those features which attract residents.
If the factors of price and availability of housing remain constant then it
would seem that the village is on the upsurge, and that its population will
continue to rise.
It seemed a logical
progression, with the information already determined, to enquire as to the
nature of the respondents employment and the distances they travelled to
work.
NATURE OF ENPLOYMENT:
7 skilled engineering workers a bricklayer
6 retired betting office clerk
3 school teachers cleaner
2 clerical workers corn mill foreman
2 cloth inspectors design engineer
2 joiners driver
2 hospital workers labourer
2 overlookers librarian
2 shopkeepers non-teaching assistant
telephone receptionist
weaver.
Surprisingly we had a number
of respondents who were not willing to indicate their occupation though, of
these, several did indicate where they worked and what distance they
travelled to work. There were thirteen out of our sample who did not respond
to any of these questions and we were at a loss to classify these persons.
It may well have been that a number of these were unemployed at the time,
but it would be impracticable simply to assume that this was true in every
case. Those who did indicate where they worked provided us with a useful
picture of the general pattern of the relationship between residence and
occupation. As can be seen from the following table, very few persons
actually work in Cowling itself, and there was no one town that could be
said to employ the majority of people. There was a balance of employment
between small villages and towns, and between Lancashire and Yorkshire,
there being no one predominant direction in which people travelled to work.
LOCATION OF
EMPLOYMENT
10 Keighley plus one part time 2 Burnley
9 Cross Hills plus one part time Utley
4 Cowling Cleackheaton
4 Eastburn Bolton
3 Colne Cononley
2 Barnoldswick 8 not gainfully employed
2 Skipton 6 retired
DISTANCE TRAVELLED TO WORK
Up to 2 miles - 6
3-4miles - 8
5-6 miles - 9
7-8 miles - 10
9-10 miles - 1
over 10 miles - 6
Travel is a significant
factor therefore In the work lives of the village residents but an even
more significant aspect of travel is the mode of transport involved. Of
the sample only 11% were dependent upon their own car for travelling to
work, 4% had a regular 'lift', and the vast majority used the bus service
as the means to commute to work. Of the regular bus users 83% had their
own car but preferred to use the bus service. It was most noticeable that
this group was comprised almost exclusively of individuals who worked in
Keighley, Eastburn and Cross Hills and that the individuals who used their
own transport travelled in the opposite direction into Lancashire. This is
rather difficult to explain as both groups could theoretically be served
by the same service, and it being less expensive, fare wise, to travel
into Lancashire. It may well be that the explanation merely concerns
convenience, it being more convenient as regards work location to travel
to Keighley than to Colne, and almost certainly Barnoldswick. Whatever the
pattern of travel may be now it would seem reasonable to assume that this
aspect of everyday life will command an increasingly important role in
determining the pattern of future development of the village, especially
when one considers the ever increasing cost of transport. It may well be
that the cost of travel to work will prohibit, and certainly check, the
flow into the village of ordinary working people, and that any future
development of the village will be limited to private speculative housing
to be occupied by families in middle class occupations. It would seem
reasonable to assume that if any expansion of the village is to take
place, then it will be of this dormitory nature. Though this is mere
speculation, our study of the social life of the village clearly
demonstrates that to a certain extent this is the nature of things at the
present time, and that if no development of the social amenities within
the village takes place, then this increasingly will become the pattern of
the future.
To determine a relevant
picture of village life, we had the rather difficult task of gauging
people's feelings of, and attitude to, the amenities of the village and to
what extent they participated in the social life of the village.
It became apparent that over 76% of our sample spent 75% of their leisure
time outside the village, and only 19% indicated that they spent 25% of
their leisure time in the village. Only one person indicated that he spent
all his leisure time in the village whereas nine indicated that they never
spent any leisure time in the village. The definition of leisure time that
we used was not simply time not spent at work, but specifically time that
was left when mandatory housework tasks, such as gardening, home
improvements, housework, washing etc., had been completed, as the majority
of the people find that this part of their lives is equally confining as
time spent in their occupation. It was also pointed out in the interviews
that special occasions should not be taken into account as these would, of
necessity, take place outside the village, so only normal weekly
activities were included in our sample findings. The overall picture
emerged that work people were outward looking in what they spent their
normal leisure time out of the village and only spent a minor part of
their time in the village itself. Where people did participate in village
activities these were organised activities within the confines of a group
which met at regular intervals and were concerned primarily with village
affairs.
Village activities that
appear to be predominant in responses are the Women's Institute, Friendly
Circle, Cricket Club, Recreation Management, Parish Council, Shooting
Club, Angling Club, Political parties and whist drives, all of which are
long founded traditional village activities. By far the two most
patronised activities revolve around the Churches and their satellite
activities, and the public houses. This is the type of village leisure
pattern that one had come to expect, but the variety of societies and
activities available are extremely wide for a village of limited
population. Patronage of the activities would seem to be relatively 'thin'
with a number of individuals concerned with three or more activities.
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of village social life is the rather
limited participation in the activities of those who are the more recent
residents, namely those who have taken up residence in the last five
years.
A number of interviewees in this category indicated that they had
participated in village activities after invitation, but no longer
continued in this practice. A number of reasons were given ranging from
lack of time due to family additions, to the activities not quite living
up to expectations. However, the most prominent and emphasised reason was
that it was difficult to be accepted into a group which had a nucleus of
established members. It would seem that a number of individuals,
especially ladies, felt that their reception had been rather cool and this
was a principle factor in their declined attendance and participation. Two
ladies in particular were extremely vocal on this point, and it does seem
that this is an undoubted factor in the lack of participation of newer
residents in social activities. However, it must be stated that a small
minority were actively involved in at least one activity and thought they
had been well received and had been pleasantly surprised at the reception
they had been given. In most cases in this group, their first contact had
been made through one of the Church organisations and then through
introduction to one of the various social activities.
It may well be that our
findings give an unfavourable picture of village activities quite falsely,
especially when one also takes into account the general pattern of
leisure, the major part of which takes place outside the village. Of those
who indicated that they never spent any of their leisure time in the
village, just over 70% are members of the category that have resided in
the village for under five years. Here we are presented with a stereotype
chicken and egg argument; is it in fact the established members of
activities that dissuade new members by their attitudes, or is it that the
newer residents' intentions of participation are only token or lacking
totally in intent and motivation? One may argue both cases from the
evidence of the responses we received, and perhaps it would be foolish to
support one argument to the exclusion of the other. It is almost certain
that in some cases elements of both arguments apply, and this only
reaffirms that individual behavior in terms of relationships to groups can
never satisfactorily be explained.
What can be stated is that
for a vast majority of people the
village does not play any significant part in their leisure time
activities, and for a small proportion, plays no part whatsoever. The
nature and form of the activities participated in outside is most
revealing in that the majority are not provided in Cowling, weight
watchers, Naturalists Society, golf, dancing, night classes, cinema,
amateur dramatics, but an even more significant indication was revealed by
those who took part in activities and societies, which are provided for in
Cowling, but prefer to be active in these in another locality. It may well
be that, as in the case of employment, the village residents are outward
looking when they evaluate how they will spend their leisure time. The
trend of the responses indicate this as a reality, and with individual
means of transport and the relatively short distance of travel involved it
would seem that this pattern is now established and is almost certainly
irreversible. It is possible to reach this conclusion as it appeared that
this was a general attitude, not merely one that was confined to the
'newcomers' to this village. All evidence indicates that this was a trend
initiated by the 'native' inhabitants who, to some degree, must be
responsible for transferring or spreading this particular attitude.
The nature and life of the
village has therefore experienced a most eventful century and a half of
innovation ,re-structuring and reorientation.
It has been physically relocated by the industrial revolution and changing
pattern of communication routes, which at one time initiated an explosion
of development population and social amenities. These factors transformed
the village or villages from a scattered, rather isolated agricultural
tranquility, into a small but bustling thriving textile centre. The entire
pattern of life was changed in emphasis and intensity when the village, by
the end of the nineteenth century, created its own identity as Cowling,
and to a certain extent a degree of antinomy in the conduct of its own
affairs. It was, at this point, that the village enjoyed its greatest
prosperity and character, and even though much of the prosperity of
development has now been lost, this element of character still remains
strong. Typically the snowball effect that industrial development had upon
the population, and the growing population's effect on village development
slowed with eventually the cycle turning to a short static period and then
accelerating into depression with the village depopulating with the
constriction of textile production. At this time, Cowling experienced the
effects of inertia, an established industry with increasing costs and no
new type of industry coming forward to diversify the opportunities of
employment.
It was during this period that the present attitudes formed, residents and
their successive generations seeking employment outside the village with a
more extensive and diverse pattern of occupations. Depopulation continued
in the first three decades and was further supplemented by the educational
innovations introduced in 1944. Free Gramrnar School places for working
class children who successfully negotiated the eleven plus added a new
perspective. Many of Cowling's children who took this opportunity and who
continued in higher education, followed an established national pattern of
never returning to their original area of residence. The external
economies of this situation also had a great effect on village life during
this period. Many small family businesses could no longer continue and so
wound up, to be followed by even the larger organised retailers e.g. the
Co-operative Society. This was the final link in the chain of cause and
effect which now leaves us with the situation as it exists today.
The only favourable factor
to emerge in this downward spiral
concerns the recent speculative building of private housing. Though this
was extremely speculative at the outset, there has been a gradual but
relentless progress in this sphere. This development has brought a new
dimension to the village as many of the occupants are new to the area, and
even though they are employed often in a tertiary service capacity which,
of necessity, has to be outside the village, the monetary advantage is by
no means insignificant to the community. As we have seen the involvement
this group of people have in the village is not extensive, but neither is
that of the majority of the original villagers. Perhaps Cowling is on the
verge of a new era, as it was in 1800, and certainly a number of
characteristics are extremely similar, with new residents from diverse
origins, building development and the possibility of new affluence. What
is significantly different is the nature of the new order, in the past
technology and industrial innovation changed the nature of Cowling, today
it may be that a historical cycle has turned full circle and Cowling may
become a dormitory residential village due to its location and may be ever
increasingly outwardly dependent upon larger settlements for employment
and leisure. Speculative though this hypothesis may be, all the existing
tendencies indicate that this will be the dominant aspect for cowling in
the future.
Goto Top |
|